Reflecting on the pros and cons of bring your own device (BYOD) programs in public k12 schools, I wonder if this is the next stage in our evolutionary ascent into 21st century education or a diversion doomed for extinction, that is, popular today but soon to be superseded by another strategy. What makes BYOD, at least in public k12, the next sensible step on the one hand, and on the other hand what might make it an unsustainable dead end? BYOD has been the practice for years in higher education, but how will it play out in my district and districts like mine? What got us here and what will it take to make BYOD a success?
In the early years of education technology, the classroom lab was the focus of our energy and efforts. Schools with ample lab space, power and data ports, were the envy of all others. Classrooms outfitted with desktop computers and big CRT screens seemed, at the time, to be the perfect blend of technology and education. Who could have predicted that these adaptations would soon come under pressure from a new vision of technology in education? Indeed, it wasn’t long before the arrival of affordable laptops made the classroom lab look more 20th century than 21st. Wireless networks and laptops on mobile carts made every classroom a lab, accessible to all students and exempt from many infrastructure deficiencies. But, in time we discovered that mobile carts, like labs, had their own limitations and visionaries sought better solutions for the computing demands of k12 education. This led to the emergence of one to one programs that put laptops in the hands of every student throughout the school day. While celebrated in many locations, school provided one to one is expensive and therefore not a universal model. Perhaps, to overcome the high cost of one to one programs, or possibly inspired by higher education, at some point the BYOD model was suggested as a reasonable solution for one to one computing in public k12.
I believe there are certain steps and prerequisites for a successful BYOD program in public k12. The first step is wide acceptance by the faculty, administration, students and community for the program. The curriculum should be designed to make use of student devices throughout the school day and the faculty should instruct by actively engaging student in the use of their devices. Community support for the program is essential as is safe and easy access to the internet for all students from home. If only some students have this privilege then what is to be done for those who don’t? Indeed, in the interest of fairness, is it even reasonable to pursue BYOD if it rewards only some of our students? After all, one of the advantages of BYOD is the idea that students can work in an educationally rich online environment from home. If we offer a BYOD opportunity to the community, we might expect that some families for various reasons will choose not to participate. Any BYOD initiative must include a school supplied option. Before launching a BYOD it would be wise to establish both guidelines for what is an acceptable device as well as what is acceptable behavior with the device at school. We must be mindful of functional requirements as well as equitability as we identify appropriate devices for the classroom. Network security and network capacity should be reviewed before a program is launched. You must have the means to identify devices and control access to the internet from within your district. Without network access control, content filtering will be compromised. Virus protection is another area demanding attention. Ensuring that student owned devices are protected with up to date anti-virus software and definitions is a matter of importance and must be supported by policy and procedure. Classroom and device support, re-charging stations, data backup and recovery as well as strategies for replacement of lost devices are just a few other areas that should be carefully considered when planning a BYOD program. If BYOD is to be the next stage in our ascent into 21st century education, then it must adapt and survive the challenges of a demanding and diverse public k12 environment.







